IIIP · EU GEOTHERMAL GRID INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM

Industrial Infrastructure Intelligence · Geothermal Grid Economics & System Flexibility Integration

43 GW
Untapped EGS
301 TWh
Annual Yield
1 : 5
VRE Displaced
<€100
MWh Threshold
🗓 EU Action Plan · May 2026  |  Summit · June 4

Map Layers

Thermal Gradient Raster
ENTSO-E Transmission Grid
50 km Interconnection Buffers
Prime Deployment Polygons
Geothermal Site Markers

Thermal Gradient

> 150 °C/km — Critical
100–150 °C/km — High
70–100 °C/km — Moderate
40–70 °C/km — Marginal

Site Status

Operational
Development
Pilot / EGS
Exploration
Heat Use

Grid Infrastructure

ENTSO-E 400 kV
ENTSO-E 220–330 kV
50 km Buffer Zone
Prime Deployment Zone
⬡ EU GEOTHERMAL INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM · IIIP

Click a site marker

Select any geothermal location on the map to load full intelligence data
Temp °C/3km
Capacity MW
Gradient °C/km
VALCOE €/MWh
LFSCOE Score vs Solar+BESS

LCOE vs Full System Cost (LFSCOE)

Grid Capacity Displacement — 1 MW Geo : 5 MW VRE+BESS

Operational Flexibility Profile

System Architecture

Deep Geothermal Reservoir
Continuous Thermal Resource Extraction
Binary ORC Generation Plant
10%–100% Load Flexibility · 15–30%/min Ramp
Bulk Power System Integration
Synchronous Inertia · RoCoF Dampening · Reactive Power

Risk Factors & Structural Logic Gaps

Systemic Permitting Bottlenecks

EU regulatory friction threatens commercial rollout timelines, risking stranded institutional capital.

Subsurface Geological Uncertainty

Drilling phases carry outsized financial exposure vs. predictable VRE surface assessments.

Upfront CAPEX Concentration

High initial capital extends ROI amortization windows in volatile macro environments.

Geographic Determinism

Commercial viability constrained by localised heat gradients — not grid-agnostic deployment.